Is observed traffic following policy?
Compare real sessions with intended connectivity and surface direct or east-west relationships that were never declared.
obserae turns existing NetFlow and IPFIX telemetry into practical answers about segmentation, unknown assets, suspicious destinations, behavioural change and incident context.
Each use case starts with something a security or infrastructure team needs to verify, explain or act on.
Compare real sessions with intended connectivity and surface direct or east-west relationships that were never declared.
Find active addresses, networks and services, then bring useful discoveries into a named cartography.
Review new peers, known-bad destinations, scans, unusual volumes and other behaviour that deserves attention.
Search retained sessions by asset name, time, service and context, then preserve the useful question as a detection rule.
A firewall rule or architecture diagram describes intended connectivity. It does not prove that the network is still behaving that way. Temporary access can become permanent, a workstation can reach a server through an unexpected path, or a new service can bypass the boundary where controls were originally designed.
obserae’s Flow Matrix records the communications the organisation expects between named networks, groups, hosts and services. Observed sessions can then be classified as covered or unmatched.
This helps answer:
The result is evidence for a review, not automatic enforcement. obserae remains out of band and does not block traffic; firewall, NAC or response tooling keeps that responsibility.
An inventory is only useful when it follows the infrastructure. DHCP, temporary systems, lab equipment, virtual machines and forgotten subnets make that difficult, particularly when a small team maintains both production and security.
Flow telemetry reveals active addresses and the relationships between them. obserae proposes observed networks and hosts that are absent from the cartography, so an operator can decide whether to name, classify or ignore them.
Discovery can expose:
This is network discovery from observed communications, not an intrusive vulnerability scan. It only sees what is visible in the NetFlow or IPFIX records received from configured exporters.
An encrypted connection still leaves network facts: endpoints, time, protocol, port, direction, packets and volume. obserae can enrich public destinations with cloud-provider, geography, ASN, Tor and threat-intelligence context, then make that information available to investigations and rules.
A team can review questions such as:
Threat intelligence is context, not a verdict. Lists can contain stale or shared infrastructure, and an unfamiliar destination is not automatically malicious. obserae retains the underlying session so the analyst can review the signal rather than act on a label alone.
Some useful detections are not signatures. They are changes relative to the behaviour of a host, network or service: a new peer, an unusual number of connections, a volume that does not fit the period, or a recurring pattern that suddenly moves outside its baseline.
obserae supports explicit threshold rules and statistical baselines over saved NFQL queries. The methods are documented: moving averages, medians, deviations and dispersion measures are visible to the operator rather than presented as an unexplained score.
Typical signals include:
Baselines still need context and time to learn. A deployment should begin with reviewable signals, observe false positives and only automate downstream response where the organisation has defined a safe procedure.
During an incident, the first question is often an address. The useful questions come next: what is that asset, which systems did it contact, when did the behaviour begin, was the relationship expected, and what else happened around the same time?
obserae reconstructs bidirectional sessions and associates them with cartography names, services, rules and available enrichment. NFQL can search flows, sessions, detections and context by names rather than requiring an analyst to remember every address.
An investigation can therefore move from a single indicator to:
A useful investigation query can be saved and scheduled as an alert. Structured outputs can send the result to an existing ticketing, SIEM, SOAR or on-call workflow while the detailed flow evidence remains on the obserae instance.
Security and compliance reviews need more than a current dashboard. They need evidence that can be connected to a control, an owner and a decision.
obserae can retain configuration, cartography, intended connectivity, alert history, reports and a tamper-evident audit trail. This can support reviews of segmentation, access, change and incident handling without claiming that the product delivers compliance by itself.
The dedicated NIS2 network monitoring page maps those contributions to common programme concerns and states the boundaries explicitly. The same principle applies to other frameworks: start from the control objective, identify the evidence required, then verify whether the product produces evidence the organisation can actually use.
Install obserae, connect an exporter and verify whether the evidence is useful on your own traffic.